NB: A version of this post also appears on Existential Ennui.
Crikey: would you believe it’s been over a year since I last posted a Parker Progress Report? Long enough that I expect most of you have probably forgotten what they are. To recap then: since 2010 I’ve been blogging my way through the Parker series, originally on Existential Ennui, latterly over here (I’ve also been covering the Alan Grofield spin-off novels as The Grofield Files). The last proper Parker Progress Report I posted, back in November 2011—leaving aside this one on the Dortmunder novel Jimmy the Kid, which boasts a Parker meta-cameo—was on the sixteenth Parker, Butcher’s Moon, originally published in 1974. So, seeing as January 2013 marks the beginning of what is to all intents and purposes the fiftieth anniversary of Parker, and since there’s a new movie based on the nineteenth Parker, Flashfire, due any day now (at least, in the US; it’s not out in the UK until March for some reason), I figured I’d try and rattle through the Parker Progress Reports in order to reach that book, starting with the seventeenth Parker, Comeback (1997).
In a way, taking a year-long break between Parkers makes sense: after all, Comeback didn’t appear until twenty-three years after Butcher’s Moon, although you wouldn’t guess that from reading it: the outside world may have changed, but not much has in the Parkerverse. Parker and his girlfriend, Claire, haven’t aged, and neither have Parker’s irregular cohorts, husband and wife heisting team Ed and Brenda Mackey (there’s still no word on how Ed was resurrected having apparently died in Parker #15, Plunder Squad—that won’t be addressed until Parker #21, Breakout). In fact the only real nod to change in the book is a mention that it’s become harder to find cash scores—harder, but not impossible: the caper this time centers on an evangelical event at a stadium, where cash donations will total half a million dollars.
Structurally, too, things are much as they ever were: like the bulk of its predecessors, the novel is made up of four parts; there’s the expected jumping back and forth in time, and the inevitable double-cross—and it won’t be a surprise to anyone familiar with the series to this point that that comes courtesy of the man who arranged the robbery, George Liss. Even so, Westlake does have other surprises up his sleeve, notably a new spin on Parker’s traditional plan of finding a local hideout after the score, rather than making a run for it—although for me, that doesn’t quite work here; the hideout is a little too close to the stadium for it to be believable—and Parker posing as an insurance man and winding up in a hospital teeming with cops.
Still, to my mind, there’s something missing from the book—that raw, searing intensity that the best Parkers—The Hunter, The Score, The Seventh—possess. There are some great scenes, some diverting business, but the novel never really coalesces or comes fully to life. That could be a consequence of the way it was written—in fits and starts over a twenty-plus year period, as Westlake explains in this 1997 interview by Jesse Sublett. Or maybe he just needed time to warm up. Either way, the next Parker novel, Backflash (1998), was written much faster, the way Westlake usually penned the Parkers, and for my money it’s a better book—something I’ll be exploring in the next Parker Progress Report.
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 42
Yeah, I thought Comeback was a bit weak. The series picked up with Backflash.
What’s interesting about these later books is that the first three books could with a little alteration happen in the 60s. At Firebreak, that changes and the plot starts involving computers. It’s suddenly the modern era.
What a weird coincidence, I started rereading Comeback last night. I am usually almost always rereading a Westlake. Right now I’m rereading Comeback and Kahawa. Westlake is the kind of author that you can keep rereading and get something new and valuable from the experience every time.
I also downloaded the Travis McGee series to my Kindle. They finally brought them out on Kindle a couple days ago, so now I have Parker and McGee with me everywhere I go.;-) lol
I actually love ‘Comeback’, as it was the one that really introduced me into the Parkerverse. I read ‘The Rare Coin Score’ years ago in my teens and distinctly remember not ‘getting’ it, but I picked up this one in a charity shop a while back, read it in a single sitting and suddenly realised what I’d been missing. It’s also got one of the best starts to a Parker novel, IMO – The angel said, ‘I’m not sure about this…’ ‘We are,’ Parker told him. – Perfect.
I wanted to draft you this liltte bit of observation so as to thank you very much once again over the superb things you have provided here. It is quite incredibly open-handed of you to allow publicly precisely what a number of people might have offered for sale as an e-book in order to make some dough on their own, and in particular seeing that you might have done it if you wanted. These principles as well served to become a great way to fully grasp other individuals have similar passion much like mine to understand a lot more with respect to this condition. I believe there are lots of more fun occasions in the future for folks who go through your blog.
I agree, Jason. Comeback sometimes gets some harsh comments from fans, but I think it’s a great book. I think the problem is people were anticipating Parker’s return for 23 years or so. That’s a long time for people to daydream about his comeback.
Also, I guess they expected some mention as to where Parker was all that time, maybe prison or something. But Westlake didn’t acknowledge the time away and just had Parker do what he does–steal things. The side characters were interesting and I love the idea of a Jim Baker-type preacher getting robbed. The scene where Parker beats the spit out of the preacher’s head of security and his men is awesome. It is a little lighter in tone than the previous books, there are some darkly comic moments sprinkled here and there. But it all worked–the end product was a great beginning to the second run of books.
I don’t think it was a bad book, it’s just not as good as usual. I’ve yet to read a really horrible Parker book, and I’ve read most of them.
I’m with Nick. While I thought Comeback was an enjoyable novel, the tone didn’t strike me as quite right. Too many light-hearted moments. Backflash gets us fully back into the Parker groove.
I agree with every word of Nick’s just-posted review of Backflash.
While I prefer Parker in a ’60’s or ’70’s setting, I think the post hiatus Parkers are all pretty damn good. For me, the weakest are Flashfire and Firebreak. The best are the final trilogy of Nobody Runs Forever, Ask The Parrot and Dirty Money. The series couldn’t have ended on a higher note IMO.
Thanks for the comments guys – glad these posts are providing a little food for thought. And Trent, nice to hear we’re simpatico on these two Parkers. Let’s see if that remains the case for the next one…