NB: A version of this post also appears on Existential Ennui.
I’m in the midst of a series of posts on vintage softcovers over on Existential Ennui, and I’ve reached a pair of paperbacks I was basically badgered into buying by one of the regular commenters on both The Violent World of Parker and EE—which is why I’m posting them over here as well as there (that and the fact that there’s a certain amount of fan crossover between these books and the Parkers). They’re first British paperback editions of John D. MacDonald‘s The Deep Blue Goodbye and Nightmare in Pink, both published by Pan in 1968 (and both originally published in the US by Fawcett/Gold Medal in 1964, the former as The Deep Blue Good-by), with cover artwork by Sam Peffer—among the last covers that the prolific Pan artist must have created for that publisher (I believe he left Pan in 1967). They are, respectively, books one and two in MacDonald’s twenty-one book crime fiction series starring finder of lost fings, Travis McGee, a series that TVWoP and EE regular David Plante reckoned I would find rewarding.
Now, I have tried a John D. MacDonald novel before—The Only Girl in the Game, which I liked a lot—but I’d never read any McGee. But given that Kingsley Amis was an admirer of MacDonald’s, and I am, in turn, an admirer of Amis’s; and that another writer I love, Elmore Leonard, put it on record that MacDonald was “the best first-person writer I’ve ever read,” adding, “Travis McGee’s ‘I’ was never intrusive”; and that David bloody Plante clearly wasn’t going to give it a bloody rest or give me a moment’s bloody peace until I relented and cracked the spine of a bloody McGee (figuratively speaking—because as we all know, cracking the spines of books—even ones already bloodied—is WRONG), there was nothing else for it but to dive in.
Of course, that begged the question: which editions of the early McGee novels (I’m not worrying about the later ones just yet) to begin collecting? The original Gold Medal paperbacks would be the obvious choice; not so easy to come by for someone living in the UK, but not impossible. In truth, though, those are in relatively plentiful supply if one can be arsed to order online from the States—and anyway, when have I ever plumped for the obvious choice? That left, to my mind, two options: the British hardback editions of the novels, published by Robert Hale in the 1960s and ’70s, which, with their miniscule print runs and beautiful Barbara Walton dust jackets, are prohibitively expensive these days, running into the hundreds if not thousands of pounds per book; or the British paperback editions, issued by Pan, which, when you can find them (and I found these two copies online and on a table outside a secondhand bookshop in Brighton), are fairly cheap. Naturally, skinflint that I am, I opted for the Pan paperbacks.
And I’m pleased to report that David was perfectly justified in his persistent pestering, because The Deep Blue Goodbye at least—I haven’t made it as far as Nightmare in Pink yet—is terrific: tough, but also surprisingly tender, especially once Travis McGee, who’s been hired to trace a twisted sort named Junior Allen and recover the loot Allen stole, visits Allen’s former mistress and, finding her in a dreadful state, casts aside his affected nonchalance and decides to stay and nurse her back to health. In his essay “A New James Bond,” Kingsley Amis noted that MacDonald “is by any standards a better writer than Saul Bellow, only MacDonald writes thrillers and Bellow is a human-heart chap, so guess who wears the top-grade laurels?”, but on the evidence of The Deep Blue Goodbye—and indeed The Only Girl in the Game—I’d say that MacDonald could do “human-heart” as well as anyone—and he was no slouch at the thrills either, as demonstrated by a gripping and violent final encounter at sea.
Pan had largely switched to photographic covers by the late 1960s, and while the first Pan printings of The Deep Blue Goodbye and Nightmare in Pink could boast Sam Peffer cover art, subsequent printings, and subsequent McGees, sported photographic designs. So, having started collecting the Pan paperbacks, I’m not sure I’ll stick with them . . . and serendipitously, just the other day I chanced across a different edition of the next book in the series, A Purple Place for Dying, which I’ll be showcasing on Existential Ennui shortly.
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 42
I should probably warn you that Nightmare in Pink is one of the weaker McGee’s. It wasn’t out and out awful, but compared to the rest of the books it wasn’t very good. That said when MacDonald was good he was very good.
Interesting, MacDonald wrote a few books who the main character read like a prototype for McGee. Where is Janice Galtrey for example the main character is an ex-football player turned beach bum like McGee, though he is an insurance adjuster not a “salvage consultant.”
The only thing I’ve read by Kingsly Amis is The James Bond Dossier. He does seem to be iconoclastic when literary criticism. He promoted the Bond books when they were derided by the critics, and the McGee books which where a bit more accepted (and MacDonald was a better writer than Fleming), and thought Science Fiction was serious literature when it really was a ghetto genre.
Those covers are great! They practically scream “America through the eyes of a Brit.” Hot American girls, greenbacks, and bullets! I suppose there are worse things to be reduced to. I’m a fan of all three, myself.
If you’re on a MacDonald tip, The Executioners (basis of both excellent Cape Fear movies) is pretty great. I’ve only read a couple of MacGees (the blue one and the amber one) but will be hitting up more soon.
I am very excited to see the Travis McGee novels finally make an appearance here and on EE! While I am not as well read as many of those who post here and EE, of the crime fiction I have read, NOBODY is better than DEW and JDM and there are NO characters better than Parker and Trav.
I hope you do heed Matthew’s advice and keep on reading if you don’t feel Pink is as good as Blue. The series just keeps getting better and better and really begins to hit its stride for most readers once you get up to Orange, Amber, Yellow or Gray.
I am hoping for big success with the Parker movie, not only for the sake of the Parker series and potential film franchise, but also hoping success with that film will inspire the producers of the possible McGee film to get off their arses and get that movie done!
I’m so glad you like Blue, Nick! Travis McGee is a state of mind. It’s about rebellion, non-conformity, it’s about a boat bum Quixote destined to right wrongs but have his heart broken repeatedly in the process. And also really get his ass kicked in the process.
The books start REALLY getting strong by Tan, and then you’ll notice each book starts becoming more linked with the next one, with Trav going through a serious mid-life crisis by Copper.
Trav is Parker with a moral streak, Parker is Trav devoid of compassion. Of course Trav quantifies, contextualizes and philosophizes so much he could be the latter day Mark Twain, which is a Stark (ahem) contrast to the quintessential laconic male–Parker. But technically, they’re both criminals, and they are my two favorite fictional characters–as I’ve said before about a dozen times, but I can’t stop praising DEW and JDM. Simply the best.
Travis McGee gets name checked when a character in a Parker novel is caught “reading the latest Travis McGee.” Other than Dan Kearney, I believe he’s the only fictional series character ever mentioned in a Parker. DEW and JDM were great friends.
While there are certain similarities between Parker and McGee, the character that reminds me the most of McGee is F. Paul Wilson’s Repairman Jack. Both McGee and Jack are the person who people turn to when normal legal means fail. Of course, there are major differences in the two series. McGee never had to deal with anything supernatural. The influence is mention in one of the Repairman Jack novels where Jack picks up one of the McGee novels and notices the similarities.
Clue, would you agree maybe Lavender or Tan is where JDM really hits his stride? I mean, they are ALL great, but the early ones can be a bit too talky and often have 2-3 pages of a character spouting expository dialogue.
Tan in particular stands out in my mind as to when John D. strips back some awkwardness and streamlines the McGee philosophy, the dialogue becomes a little terser and to the point, and McGee just seems a bit more “mature.” Tan is also where McGee sums up his personal philosophy and daydreams about painting it on a placard and walking down the streets waving it, winking and smirking at all the pretty girls.;-) I love his philosophy! Part of which is:
LOVE ALL LOVE! HATE ALL HATE! LEAVE EVERYONE ALONE TO DO IT IN THEIR OWN WAY!
The early books are great too. They’re a little less philosophical and more rough and ready. But McGee really comes into his own as an iconic character about half-way through the series.
I agree Dave. For me, Brown was where it STARTED to kick into gear, Indigo took it up a notch and then by Lavender, things were in FULL gear. The addition of Meyer as a full supporting character by this time also pushed the series forward to a new level.
One thing JDM had going right from the start was the villains. Junior Allen is the first in a long line of creepy, vile individuals who Trav has to deal with in his “salvage” operations.
I have that Pan Deep Blue.
I’m an admirer of John D. Macdonald but Kingsley Amis is rather far off the mark when he claims that JDM is “by any standards a better writer than Saul Bellow.” Any?
As Kingsley was an anti-semite, I wouldn’t take anything he has to say about Bellow or other Jewish writers seriously.
I’d encourage you to pick up a Bellow novel, Nick.
Of course Amis Jnr would become a great champion of Bellow as the premiere American writer of his time.
And here’s a nice quote from Martin Amis that brings us full circle: “Saul Bellow and I agreed that for an absolutely reliable and unstinting infusion of narrative pleasure in a prose miraculously purged of all false qualities, there was no one quite like Elmore Leonard.”
MA:
Not to say he wasn’t, because I honestly have no clue, but can you back up “strong anti-semite” a bit? That’s a hell of a charge to toss around. It’s a bit of a thing with me that strong charges against someone should be backed up with evidence.
(If you think that’s annoying in a comment thread, imagine knowing me in person!)
I don’t find it at all annoying to be asked to back up that claim, Trent, but you do misquote me. I didn’t say a “strong anti-semite”. I simply said Kingsley Amis was an anti-semite.
The main sources to back up this claim of anti-semiticism are Kingsley Amis’s private letters (published after his death), and his son Martin’s testimony.
See, for instance:
http://philosopedia.org/index.php/Kingsley_Amis
which quotes Anthony Julius’s ‘Trials of the Diaspora, A History of Anti-Semitism in England’ (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010):
‘[Kingsley Amis wrote] “The great Jewish vice is glibness, fluency … also possibly just bullshit, as in Marx, Freud, Marcuse.” Or, “Chaplin is a horse’s arse. He’s a Jeeeew you see, like the Marx Brothers, like Danny Kaye.” As for the cultural complexion of America, Amis had this to say: “I’ve finally worked out why I don’t like Americans. . . .Because everyone there is either a Jew or a hick.” Amis himself defined his anti-Semitism as being “Very mild.”‘
Martin Amis discusses his dad’s “mild” anti-semiticism in this video around the five minute mark:
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/43436/‘ah-there’s-another-one’
Although I’m loath to quote the UK Daily Mail on anything, they do provide a useful series of additional quotations from Kingsley Amis’s private letters:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-486941/Spicier-novel-literary-feud-raging-Amis-dynasty-Marxist-critic.html
—-
‘There is a lengthy letter to [Philip] Larkin in 1957 about publication of one of [Amis’s] books that had been cut, in which he writes: “To hear that you find it tolerable is a great relief. Book due before Xmas they said, only I’ve had a clipping from some trade paper that says Jan, filthy lying profiteering bugger-the-author Yids.”
[….]
‘Despite these jibes, he did write one letter, in 1962 when he was teaching at Cambridge, in which he declared: “It may be tedious and not with-it to say so, but anti-Semitism in any form, including the fashionable one of anti-anti-anti-Semitism, must be combated.”
‘Unlike the other letters, which were written privately to friends, this one was to the editor of The Spectator and was for publication.’
——–
As such I would not consider credible any literary judgement Kingsley Amis exercised in regards Bellow, whose work often explored Jewish life in 20th Century America. He was clearly prejudiced.
OK, here’s the full relevant paragraph from “A New James Bond” for context:
“I lament this – I mean I lament what I take to be a trend against the genres. It might well be agreed that the best of serious fiction, so to call it, is better than anything any genre can offer. But this best is horribly rare, and a clumsy dissection of the heart is so much worse than boring as to be painful, and most contemporary novels are like spy novels with no spies or crime novels with no crimes, and John D. MacDonald is by any standards a better writer than Saul Bellow, only MacDonald writes thrillers and Bellow is a human-heart chap, so guess who wears the top-grade laurels? And, whatever abject mess he might have made of everything else in the story, no self-respecting television dramatist would have brought Desdemona momentarily back to life after Othello had smothered her.”
Amis picked Bellow as an example – you suggest perhaps because of his antisemitism, Matthew, although it looks to me like a straightforward criticism. Either way, it’s beside the point: it was ‘literary’ fiction in general Amis was taking aim at, suggesting that writers such as MacDonald are as good as, and sometimes better than, literary writers.
Happy to discuss Amis and my opinions and feelings about him further, but let’s do it over on EE – I’ll reproduce this comment over there.
MA:
Sorry for misquoting you. I assure you it wasn’t intentional. Just sloppy reading resulting in sloppy writing.
In the scheme of things, I’m not sure my accidental modifier of “strong” makes much difference, sad to say.
Thanks for backing it up. Sorry to learn that you could. I was hoping you were wrong.
Also, the Marx Brothers were hilarious. As were these guys.
Cross-post from Existential Ennui:
Now in response to your latest comment, Nick.
By the way it’s Bellow, not Roth!
Look, genre writers, ‘lit fic’ writers, whatever – all that matters is good writing. Full credit to KA for attacking the hibrow/lowbrow thing back then when it certainly wasn’t fashionable (these days the debate is kind of dead in the water, don’t you think? No shortage of critical love for genre writers.)
But for Amis to state “a clumsy dissection of the heart is so much worse than boring as to be painful” in reference to lit fic and then pick as his example Saul Bellow is ridiculous. The author of ‘Augie March’, ‘Seize The Day’, and ‘Herzog’? They’re masterful novels that have stood the test of time. ‘Augie’, in particular, is a feast, a tour de force. I have an essay on the novel coming out in the next issue of the Saul Bellow Journal.
Of course that could have just been Amis’s opinion. Fine, he doesn’t like Bellow. But knowing Amis’s prejudices, I detected something else there. I figure Bellow epitomised a certain type of cerebral Jewishness (and literary success) that Amis hated. So I don’t think it’s clear-headed literary judgement.
By the way, I should make note that I actually like the fiction of Kingsley Amis. I don’t need political correctness and strength of character in my novelists (that attitude would cull my library rather significantly). I just objected to Amis’s rather revolting bigotry clouding his literary judgement.
NB: I’ve corrected that error in my earlier comment.
Matthew: I’m a big fan of the Repairman Jack series, and I can definitely see the similarities between the characters.
I only started reading the Jack books earlier this year and read pretty much all of F. Paul Wilson’s Adversary Cycle and Secret History of the World novels before starting in on the young adult Jack books, then the adult novels. I just finished The Haunted Air (so far the weakest of the series) and started Gateways about an hour ago.
Still have quite a few novels before everything culminates in Nightworld, then I’ll read Quick Fixes, the shorts story collection, and Cold City, the first of three prequels. I love the supernatural aspect and the cosmic battle between “The Ally” and “The Otherness” is hugely dramatic and entertaining. I love the conspiracy aspect of the secret societies as well, as I am a bit of a conspiracy buff.
I’ve recommended Repairman Jack to other crime fiction devotees but it’s been mixed results. Some just can’t swallow the supernatural aspects. At first, I didn’t know if I was going to be able to, either, but once I got involved in the overall storyline, I was hooked.
I’ve read al the Repairman Jack books, but only read The Keep of the Adversary series. I want to read a few before I tackle Nightworld.
I use to lurk at F. Paul Wilson’s page and on the forum there were a few people who just couldn’t get around the supernatural parts. That was never a problem for me, but I do wonder what a non-supernatural Jack novel would be like. The closest to that would be Legacies.
I’m a member over at Repairmanjack.com as well, Matthew. You’re right, I think Legacies is the only RJ novel I’ve read yet that doesn’t have a supernatural component. I liked the Japanese troubleshooter in that novel; a shame FPW had him killed at the end, I could see him as a recurring character in the series very easily.
It’d be a good idea to read the entire Adversary Cycle before tackiling Nightworld, because there are characters introduced in those books that are important to Nightworld. Also, I’m sure you know Nightworld was just rereleased as a revised edition. That’s the edition to read.
One last thing: if you haven’t read FPW’s Black Wind, please give that one a shot. It’s truly excellent.
I have a tattered copy of Black Wind that I picked up at my library’s free book section. I’ve been meaning to read it for awhile though.
Mr. Asprey: I never knew the elder Amis was an anti-semite. But your sources seem pretty genuine. I never read an Amis novel. Nor a Saul Bellow novel, but I may give one a shot sometime soon, since you so favorably compared him to JDM. Would you have a specific novel to recommend starting with?
I don’t know if Bellow was a better writer than JDM, obviously, yet, but a large part of the appeal of JDM is in his Travis McGee character. It’s hard to put into context just how refreshing and unique this character was when the first books hit the stands. The McGee series went on to influence a multitude of writers and more specifically the way writers develop an ongoing series of novels featuring the same protagonist.
I’ve read a fair amount of JDM’s standalones and although some swear they are his best work, I beg to differ. The McGee series, taken as one huge saga, is simply groundbreaking in it’s attention to detail, character development, quality of prose, sense of moral justice, sense of obligation to the enviornment, etc.
One of the main things I love about the books is McGee’s frequent comments on being a non-conformist, and not playing the 9-5 game with the wife and kiddies, the stationwagon, golf handicap, stock dividends, and the obligatory Myocardial Infarction which is often the result of juggling all the above. I found great solace and enlightenment as a 13 or 14 year old upon discovering JDM’s (through McGee) observations that being a rebel and not going with the stream just because everyone else is doing it is not neccessarily a “bad” thing, and in it’s own way quite noble and brave. These sentiments were not being made known to me in my family life, school or culture at the time.
I know some may say that this wasn’t exactly a brand new sentiment at the time JDM was espousing it, but it was in the context and style in which it was conveyed that reveals it’s brilliance.
Some of the drawbacks would be JDM’s women characters, mainly in the early books, were portrayed as quite weak and dependent on Trav for everything from psychoanalysis to theraputic sex, and the novels do tend to play to a certain formula. Another thing I noted is how hypocritical McGee is to his own sexual philosophy. Many times in the books McGee states “life is not a candy store” and sex without emotional bonds is meaningless, and even degrading. But time and again he hops into the sack on a moment’s notice with one nubile female or another. In Frefall in Crimson, however McGee acknowledges his hypocrisy in this area.
Here’s a quote about John D. Macdonald that I often see bouncing around the web (I hesitate to quote from Wikipeida, which we all know is generally stuff we can wipe our asses with, but this seems legit). “Macdonald is by any standards a better writer than Saul Bellow, only Macdonald writes thrillers and Bellow is a human heart chap, so guess who wears the top grade laurels?” That’s from Kingsley Amis.
http://postmoderndeconstructionmadhouse.blogspot.com/2015/01/john-d-macdonald-look-at-some-aspects.html#.VNHn89L
The Travuis McGee novels are the first things I’d give my 12 year old child to read; when once’s intellectual sense starts sniffing out how rigged the world plays it’s essential they read something soul-fortifying like a Travis McGee novel, a Lew Archer novel, a Parker nove so their sense of justice doesn’t wither and diel. But McGee was the first one I discovered, all those years ago. I still love Travis McGee and JDM for creating him.
In my humble opinion, The Deep Blue Good-By is a remarkable piece of work by whatever standards you’d like to apply. I’m not talking about McGee’s comic book like superhero antics in subduing and killing Junior Allen (after all, one of the main purposes of this kind of fiction is to entertain); rather, the intricacy of the plotting, the razorsharp characterizations, the finely tuned and highly observant sense of place (which MacDonald fails with, somewhat, in the McGee novels that he moves outside of Florida), the observations and ruminations of McGee – these are all superb, even amazing.
http://postmoderndeconstructionmadhouse.blogspot.com/2015/03/john-d-macdonald-deep-blue-good-by.html#.VRTpydKUc7W
McGee doesn’t do the usual superhero crap characters like James Bond and Spenser do, Elizabeth. Travis usually gets his ass kicked and winds up in the hospital. In Lavender, an old, fat, ex-pug puts Trav in the hospital for weeks with two punches. And there are plenty of more instances. Trav is no superman, his vulnerability, physically and emotionally, is remarkable in a genre with Jack Reachers and Spensers and Joe Pikes.