(NB: A version of this post also appears on Existential Ennui.)
Slight change of plan here: I had intended to post a Westlake Score this week, but I’ve decided to hold off on that for the moment—partly because on a whim I actually started reading the Westlake Score in question, and so I might as well delay blogging about it until I’ve finished it, at which point I’ll be able to review it as well as drone on drearily about its scarcity (which, depending on your point of view, could either be a good thing or a bad thing); partly because it fits in with a series of posts I have planned, and I’m not quite ready to begin that series yet; but also because I realised there’s another Westlake novel I’ve yet to review, one which I read ages ago but for some reason never posted anything substantial about: Killy.
It was whilst I was assembling my new, permanent Existential Ennui page, Beautiful British Book Jacket Design of the 1950s and 1960s (which is off to a cracking start, having been linked to via tweets by Alexis Petridis of The Guardian and writer Margaret Atwood) that I realized I hadn’t yet reviewed Killy. First published in the US in 1963, it didn’t make its debut in the UK until the following year, when T. V. Boardman published it as part of their American Bloodhound Mystery line (no. 454), under one of the best dustjackets Boardman’s in-house designer, Denis McLoughlin, ever created for a Westlake novel. Indeed, legend has it that that’s actually McLoughlin himself on the front cover you can see above—which is possibly why the Boardman edition is so scarce: there are currently no copies of it for sale online.
Killy was Donald E. Westlake’s fourth novel under his own name, and is the first-person account of one Paul Standish, a trainee at the American Alliance of Machinists and Skilled Trades union (an organization which, in one of Westlake’s self-referential nods, also merits a mention in the later Richard Stark/Parker novel Butcher’s Moon). Paul is wet behind the ears but eager to learn, so when a junior executive named Walter Killy takes Paul under his wing, Paul is more than happy to follow Killy’s lead. Killy takes Paul to the small town of Wittburg to assess an application from the workers at the McIntyre Shoe Co. plant to join the AAMST, but when the pair get to Wittburg they encounter a decidedly frosty reception: they’re arrested, assaulted, and accused of shooting and killing Charles Hamilton—the McIntyre worker who invited them to the town.
Before the story’s done there’ll be another corpse lying alongside Hamilton in the Wittburg morgue, but despite its murder mystery trappings, Killy is less a whodunnit than a portrait of corruption and double-dealing. Paul soon learns that the affable Killy is a seasoned operator, working for his own benefit and advancement as much as, if not more than, the union’s, and happy to take another person’s credit—i.e., Paul’s—if it suits his purposes. Indeed, the picture Westlake paints of unionism isn’t especially flattering—rife with self-interest and run by hard-nosed types more than ready and willing to mix it up if needs be.
The ultimate corruption, however, is of Paul himself. At the outset of the story he’s naive and square, but he’s a fast learner, and his eventual “revenge” on Killy is as cold-hearted as the actions of any other of the colourful characters who populate the novel. Of all those participants, it’s George, the union “protector”—who calls Paul his “little friend”—who is the one player who understands just what Paul is capable of—and just how far and high he’ll eventually go in the union.
Westlake’s position as an acknowledged master of crime fiction often obscures the fact that many of his books are only crime fiction by decree. Like his near-contemporary, Ross Thomas—who also wove politics and its attendant corruption into what were ostensibly crime and spy thrillers (see The Porkchoppers for a similarly scathing take on unionism, but also The Fools in Town Are on Our Side, Chinaman’s Chance, and many other tales of wholesale corruption)—Westlake was as interested in the failings and foibles of ordinary folk as he was in the mechanics and intricacies of truck heists or bank jobs (or bloodbaths). As a protagonist, Paul Standish may not be the most memorable of Westlake’s creations . . . but as a person—as a weak, ambitious, all too-human man—he’s probably more true to life than the more exotic likes of Parker or Grofield or Dortmunder. In that sense, then, while less exciting than others of Westlake’s novels, Killy is perhaps more representative of urban America in the early 1960s—and, no doubt, can still tell us much today.
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 42
I just recently ordered a copy of this (the American edition). Haven’t gotten it yet.
One thing you and Trent are doing here that I really love is combating the well-entrenched notion that Westlake only wrote hard-edged crime fiction as Richard Stark, and his efforts under his own name are all funny lighthearted capers. When you read Richard Stark, or Tucker Coe, you know pretty much exactly what you’re going to get, because those are purpose-built pseudonyms–brandnames, if you will.
When you read a book by Donald Westlake, anything is possible–except boredom.
It’s all part of our grand, elaborate, meticulously manufactured plan to alter the perception of Westlake in the wider world, Chris. Either that, or a reflection of our utterly random and haphazard reading habits.
After reading the review, I am reminded of the afore-mentioned Porkchoppers. I’ve read all of Ross Thomas’ work. The Porkchoppers was good, but The Fools In Town Are On Our Side was really a masterpiece. As was Chinaman’s Chance. His Oliver Beeck books, which spawned the film St. Ives starring Charles Bronson, are wuite good too.
Ross Thomas belongs to that rarefied club of truly outstanding writers, as of course DEW/Stark does.
Nick, you probably won’t get this question but have you read any of Paco Ignacio Taibo’s Hector Belascoaran Shayne books? Or Manuel Vasquez Montalban’s Pepe Carvalho books?
They’re really, really good. Intelligent, meaningful crime fiction that no doubt transcends the genre.
I read Put A Lid on It by Westlake and it reminded me of Ross Thomas. It was almost as if you combined Westlake’s and Thomas’s fiction into one book. It being about a professional theif that gets mixed up in political shenagians.
I think Thomas’s best book was The Fools In Town Are On Our Side with Chinaman’s Chance as a close second.
I agree with you, Matthew, about Put A Lid On It.
And Fools really is a wonderful book, isn’t it?
The Durant/Wu trilogy rocks, and another favorite of mine is The Mordida Man.
The only really bad thing you could say about Fools is that it’s the most cynical book by a very cynical writer. It might be to dark for some people. It’s my favorite though.
I haven’t read Mordida Man but I want too.
I also liked how interconnected Thomas’s books are like how Howard Mott appears in both the Wu/Durant and the Mac/Padillo books or how Ah, Treachery mentions characters from several other books.
Yes, it’s a very cynical work, but honestly, I believe it’s spot on in it’s accuracy. Many towns that are essentially corrupt and politically incestuous are run in a similiar manner. I should know, I was born and raised in Providence, Rhode Island. Rhode Island has been called the most corrupt state in the country by many in the know. Certainly when you consider how small it is, we seem to have a hugely disproportionate amount of ethics violation and mafia influence.
Trust me, Matthew, Mordida Man is awesome. It’s protagonist, Chubb Dunjee, is a hugely entertaining character and was mentioned in Voodoo, LTD. as being friends with Artie and Durant. He’s an ex-congressman who essentially became a payoff man to get political prisoners out of Mexico, and in the book he takes on the task of trying to arrange for the President’s kidnapped brother safe return.
A typically enigmatic and wonderful Thomas character like the WuDu team, Lucifer St. Dye, St Ives, etc. All of Thomas’ characters are street savvy, know how the world really works, and become unforgettable once discovered.
According to a recent study, the most corrupt state in the U.S. is Georgia, followed by South Dakota, Wyoming, Virginia, Maine, South Carolina, North Dakota (all that oil money in the Dakotas), Michigan, Nevada, Maryland, Idaho–
http://www.stateintegrity.org/your_state
Rhode Island comes in 41st. Out of 50. But it’s how you play the game, right?
;)
*Lucifer Dye, not St. Dye;-) lol
Chris, read this and be enlightened:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/03/10/the-most-per-capita-corruption.html
Leaving aside the fact that I’m not all that impressed by an opinion piece in The Daily Beast, I can’t help but note that many of the states that have more corruption than Rhode Island also have fewer people. Wyoming has a little over half a million people, and ranks #3. Rhode Island has almost twice as many and ranks 41st. Do the math.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_population
Perhaps not coincidentally, all of the most corrupt states are dominated by Republicans. But low population often means more corruption, not less. And less government, strangely, often means more corruption–fewer watchdogs, fewer safeguards, and corporations that bring money into a smaller city or state desperate for it often end up owning the whole shooting match.
Alan Dershowitz (OJ lawyer) is also credited as saying, in his experience, RI is the most corrupt state he’s worked in. Does that count for anything?
It counts for a good chuckle. And that’s about all. :)
‘Killy’ seems to me to be Westlake’s excellent contribution to a hardboiled tradition reaching back to Hammett’s ‘Red Harvest’. Westlake calls Wittburg a “sewn-up city”. In a recently published academic essay on ‘Red Harvest’ and the 1946 film noir ‘The Strange Love of Martha Ivers’, I call that mythical urban setting the ‘poisonous noir city’. I don’t mention ‘Killy’, but you guys might find the essay an interesting examination of the tradition Westlake was clearly drawing on (another good example is Ross MacDonald’s ‘Blue City’).
You can read the essay here:
‘Owning It: Dashiell Hammett, Martha Ivers,and the Poisonous Noir City’ by Matthew Asprey Gear
http://www.arts.mq.edu.au/documents/hdr_journal_neo/neoMatt2011_2.pdf
Here’s the abstract:
‘The Strange Love of Martha Ivers’ (Lewis Milestone, 1946) emerged during a period of
radical filmmaking before the McCarthyist crackdown on left-wing elements in
Hollywood. This film noir melodrama exposes the murderous political, legal, and
economic foundation of (the fictional) Iverstown, Pennsylvania, said to be ‘America’s
Fastest Growing Industrial City.’ The power nexus is an arranged marriage between the
city’s industrial heiress and an alcoholic District Attorney. Sam Masterson, a war veteran
and drifter, is the unwitting catalyst for the self-destruction of this corrupt political order.
This paper examines the foundational influence of Dashiell Hammett’s hardboiled urban
vision on the archetypal ‘poisonous noir city’, of which Iverstown is an outstanding
example. Hammett’s novel Red Harvest (1929) is set in the mining town of Personville or
Poisonville (based on Butte, Montana) following the defeat of a worker revolt organised
by the Industrial Workers of the World. The physical spaces of Personville are mapped as
we follow the Continental Op’s malicious interference with the fluxing alliances of
political and criminal power. In its employment of what Dennis Broe calls the ‘outside–
the–law fugitive protagonist’, Martha Ivers maps the postwar urban landscape of
Iverstown through Sam’s attempts to negotiate with the city’s corrupt power nexus.
If Red Harvest dramatizes a brief moment of criminal anarchy in the aftermath of the
violent suppression of a workers’ revolt, Martha Ivers updates the poisonous noir city to
an era of capitalist triumph. Taken together, the novel and film present a grim chronology
of workers’ fortunes under twentieth century industrial progress.
Westlake was not a man of the left, it should be noted. Nor do I think he would be remotely at home in today’s Republican party, in spite of his having written a not terribly enthusiastic endorsement of Bush’s response to 911 for The Weekly Standard. Honestly, I don’t know why they even published that piece. “In the first day or two after September 11, George W. Bush could be seen floundering, breathing open-mouthed like a fish, waiting for somebody to tell him what to do. But, more rapidly than I expected, he realized what he had to do. He had to become a grownup.” Now that’s being awfully kind to Dubya. But somehow I don’t think he got any more invites to the White House after that. ;)
Both sides can claim him, and both have, but I don’t think either faction ever made it stick. He saw human nature too well to ever trust human politics–or human revolutions.
I have been a user for a little over 20 years..and i have yet to hear anonye call meth by those silly names..we just call it..Ice, Go, or Rocket fuel. as far as the Bathtub Crank goes its hard to find anywhere..but on the street we call that Chicken Scratch.
I don’t care if they are too pricey for you. It is still wrong to steal. If you can not afford to pay for them, then you really do not need them. You also may want to read the YA terms of service. You are asking for assistance with some that is not legal, which is a violation of those terms.
Thanks for mentioning that piece about Bush. Is it available online? I’d love to read it. I can’t imagine DEW writing a piece in support of Dubya, no matter how tepid the support.
It’s online, and very brief. And my suspicion is that he hated himself in the morning. His politics were not easy to pigeonhole–a mix of progressive and conservative ideas–but he normally had a better b.s. detector.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/donald-e.-westlake
I’m a flaming liberal (though a lot more centrist than I used to be). I crawled to the polls in 2000 with pneumonia in my lungs to vote against Bush, I disagreed with virtually everything he did as President, and after 9/11, I briefly thought he was doing a good job–you just want to believe in your leader in a crisis. Then I came to my senses, along with most of the rest of the country. Something like that can make anybody lose their bearings. We live in North Manhattan, and for weeks afterwards, you could smell death in the air. Not a metaphor.
The Weekly Standard is a reactionary rag, and Westlake should have known better, but so should a lot of people. Judge not lest ye be judged.
I’m no fan of Bush–I’m also no fan of Obama. I’m unaffiliated, and don’t think much of either party. But it’s totally understandable to me why DEW wrote what he did after 9/11. He didn’t have all the pertinent information. Even George Carlin cut Dubya some slack and gave support to the administration after 9/11.
Yeah, you’re right. You just always want writers you admire to be as wise and far-seeing in real life as they are in their storytelling, and that rarely if ever happens. They’re just a bunch of schmucks like you and me. ;)
We agree on this, except I think most politicians are far dumber than you or I.
just found a copy today with a dust jacket, the boardman edition
nice jacket.