So this girl walks into a bar…
When she walks out there’s a man with her. She goes to bed with him, and she likes that part. Then she kills him, and she likes that even better.
She cleans out his wallet and keeps moving, taking a new name for each change of address. She’s been doing this for a while, and she’s good at it.
Then a chance remark gets her thinking of the men who got away, the lucky ones who survived a night with her.
And now she’s a girl with a mission. Picking up their trails. Hunting them down. Crossing them off her list…
Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is my favorite movie. I’m not saying it’s the greatest movie ever made or anything like that (although I have said that before), but it’s my favorite.
It’s also a film that inspires incredibly divergent reactions. Some (like me) think it’s pure genius from start to finish. Others take it as camp that’s fun but without artistic merit. Many others think it’s absolute trash. Quite a few likely walked out of it (or turned off their televisions) in disgust.
Why such divergent reactions? Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is incredibly over the top. Just when you think it can’t get any more over the top, it does. And again. And again. And then, unbelievably, again. By the end of my first viewing, the concrete theater floor was giving my jaw a closer shave than my Gillette.
I don’t think Lawrence Block’s new novel, Getting Off, is nearly as good as Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (what is?), but it did remind me of it in its insistence on going as over the top as can be. Block (writing, in tiny letters on the cover, “as Jill Emerson,” a pseudonym he used for seven novels about lesbians in the ’60s and 70s) keeps going there. Again. And again. And again.
And I think it will draw a similar reaction. Some will think it’s genius. Some will enjoy it for the spectacle without necessarily thinking it’s great art (I am in this category). Some will think it’s trash. And if there are people who read it who found a coverless copy so they had no idea what they were getting into, I imagine there will be some who pitch it in disgust.
The cover is truth in advertising. Getting Off is indeed “A Novel of Sex & Violence.”
Lots and lots of sex. She does it like this. She does it like that. She does it with a Wiffle ball bat! Well, not that last one, but that’s only because Block didn’t think of it, or maybe that scene was edited out for length.
Lots and lots of violence, too. Blood, guts, guns, cuts, knives, lives, wives, nuns, sluts! Well, no nuns, but that’s only because our protagonist is mainly concerned with men.
Only a writer of Block’s skill could have pulled off (so to speak) this parade of red and white bodily fluids. Depending on what he wants to do with a scene, it can be erotic, disturbing, hilarious, terrifying, or any combination thereof. Is the novel entirely successful? I didn’t think so. But it was a lot closer to successful than I expected when it truly dawned on me just how far Block was willing to go, and how often.
I don’t know how you’ll react to Getting Off–I hope this review has given you some idea. I do know that Getting Off is destined for cult status, just like Beyond the Valley of the Dolls.
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of Social_Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::end_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/violentw/www/www/wp-content/plugins/social/lib/social/walker/comment.php on line 42
This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Great review. I really want to read the book now.
RE:BTVOTD When it originally came out I was 9 years old and had this babysitter who must have been in her late 30’s or early 40’s named Peggy. She reminded me of a female version of Popeye the Sailor…she seemed rough and tough and always had a cigarette dangling from her lip. She was also a rabid Valley Of The Dolls fan. It may have been the only book she ever read (I only saw her read TV Guide) and she was fanatic about the Sharon Tate-Patty Duke film. So imagine her excitement when she told me she couldn’t wait for the ‘sequel’….now imagine her reaction the next time she came to our house to sit after having seen Russ Meyer’s masterpiece. It was then she really became like Popeye, only uncensored. I remember her relating the plot to my Mother and literally going APE as to how Jacqueline Susann could have let that film happen. I immediately knew that someday I was going to have to see what sounded like the greatest film ever made, and like you Trent, I discovered a masterpiece where Peggy discovered a major disappointment! As for the new Jill Emerson, it sounds great, but I just saw at Amazon that it’s a hardcover, so I’ll have to wait to find a used copy or hope for a PB, which is really how it should be issued, especially since I want to shelve it with my other Jill’s! Thanks for the head’s up!
Great story! Reading it triggered “Adult Books” by X to run through my head, which is not a bad thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DeSPa4Cck0&fmt=18
I’m sure there will be a paperback, but it will likely be in the 5×8 format, which means it won’t be much cheaper than the hardcover and won’t be the same height as your other Jill Emerson paperbacks if you were aiming for shelf aesthetics (also, it only says Jill Emerson on the cover, not on the spine). I imagine this one’s going to sell well enough that used copies should be available in a few months.
Block has set up a Jill Emerson page. Scroll down for an interview with the until-recently reclusive authoress. (Um, not safe for work.)
http://lawrenceblock.wordpress.com/jill-emersons-page/
Getting Off sounds amazing! I’m not overly familiar with Block’s stuff, but maybe Getting Off is a good place to start.
Thanks for the link to the Jill Emerson page. Did not realize that the title for Sensuous is really A Madwoman’s Diary, and that I am Curious (Thirty) should have been just Thirty…signs of the times I guess. Still like my Berkeley Editions though and hope Hard Case will change their mind about the ‘pocket’ size format….again, a sign of the time!!!